November 1. On this date in 1998, Robert Stockman, coordinator of the Research Office of the US Bahá'í National Center, wrote an informal, unofficial response in reference to an ongoing discussion about the accuracy and methods of tallying North American Bahá'í membership statistics.
Bahá'í membership statistics
by Robert Stockman
1998-11
Letter One, questionSubject: Re: Bahá'í Growth
Date: 11/1/98 1:34 AMGreetings!Does anyone know the basis for the membership figures given below? Are they running composites of declarations less withdrawals and deaths? Are they the number of American Bahá'í subscribers? Do the figures include folks who signed cards during mass teaching campaigns without recognizing the station of Bahá'u'lláh? If so, is there an other basis for measuring "believers"?
Letter Two, answerSubject: RE: Bahá'í Growth
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998
From: "Stockman, Robert"
To: "Bahá'í Studies" Dear Friends: The list of Bahá'í population numbers in the United States from the 18890s to the present is a composite from various sources. The figures before 1934 are the best estimates possible, based on the US Religious Census (information collected by the Bahá'ís based on various definitions of membership). The figures from 1940 to the 1960s or 1970s come from Bahá'í News, where the figures were occasionally published. From some time in the 1970s on, a staffer at the National Teaching Committee (one with graduate school experience, not someone with no statistical experience) compiled the data from national membership records, probably annual membership reports in the files. The definition of membership is more or less the same since the 1930s; a person must sign a declaration card stating he/she believes in Bahá'u'lláh, the Bab, and `Abdu'l-Bahá, and understands there are laws and institutions to obey (the card does not specify them). The National Center, obviously, is not in the position to decide which cards were signed in good faith and which were not. The National Spiritual Assembly instituted a two-tier process about 1974, of (1) declaration, and (2) enrollment, the latter involving a meeting with the declarant to ascertain that the person understands what s/he is doing. The two-stage process was inaugurated because of abuses in mass-teaching campaigns during 1968-72. It is difficult to say how extensive "abuse" was; there are stories about what people did ("sign here and you'll start getting a newspaper every month" for example). I participated in mass teaching in Florida in 1979 and saw no cutting of corners. I have never heard anyone say that "corner cutting" was extensive or widespread, so I am of the opinion that rigorous sociological research is needed to determine it, rather than relying on anecdotes. The National Bahá'í Center does not maintain a list of "inactive" Bahá'ís. Its membership list is divided into several categories:
Date: 11/1/98 1:34 AMGreetings!Does anyone know the basis for the membership figures given below? Are they running composites of declarations less withdrawals and deaths? Are they the number of American Bahá'í subscribers? Do the figures include folks who signed cards during mass teaching campaigns without recognizing the station of Bahá'u'lláh? If so, is there an other basis for measuring "believers"?
Figure 1, "Number of American Bahá'ís for selected years" appears in Robert Stockman's short essay, "U.S. Bahá'í Community Membership: 1894-1996," published in The American Bahá'í November 23, 1996, page 27.
Note: Statistics are available for most years, but not for all. The years shown were chosen to represent trends.
Year Membership 1894 -- 7 1899 -- 1,500 1900 -- 500 1906 -- 1,500 1916 -- 2,884 1920 -- 1,500 1926 -- 1,500 1936 -- 3,000 1941 -- 4,256 1946 -- 5,134 1951 -- 6,729 1956 -- 7,578 1962 -- 9,659 1966 -- 14,716 1968 -- 17,765 1970 -- 23,994 1971 -- 40,221 1972 -- 59,372 1974 -- 63,470 1979 -- 77,396 1984 -- 91,669 1989 -- 112,000 1993 -- 120,000 1996 -- 133,000
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998
From: "Stockman, Robert"
To: "Bahá'í Studies" Dear Friends: The list of Bahá'í population numbers in the United States from the 18890s to the present is a composite from various sources. The figures before 1934 are the best estimates possible, based on the US Religious Census (information collected by the Bahá'ís based on various definitions of membership). The figures from 1940 to the 1960s or 1970s come from Bahá'í News, where the figures were occasionally published. From some time in the 1970s on, a staffer at the National Teaching Committee (one with graduate school experience, not someone with no statistical experience) compiled the data from national membership records, probably annual membership reports in the files. The definition of membership is more or less the same since the 1930s; a person must sign a declaration card stating he/she believes in Bahá'u'lláh, the Bab, and `Abdu'l-Bahá, and understands there are laws and institutions to obey (the card does not specify them). The National Center, obviously, is not in the position to decide which cards were signed in good faith and which were not. The National Spiritual Assembly instituted a two-tier process about 1974, of (1) declaration, and (2) enrollment, the latter involving a meeting with the declarant to ascertain that the person understands what s/he is doing. The two-stage process was inaugurated because of abuses in mass-teaching campaigns during 1968-72. It is difficult to say how extensive "abuse" was; there are stories about what people did ("sign here and you'll start getting a newspaper every month" for example). I participated in mass teaching in Florida in 1979 and saw no cutting of corners. I have never heard anyone say that "corner cutting" was extensive or widespread, so I am of the opinion that rigorous sociological research is needed to determine it, rather than relying on anecdotes. The National Bahá'í Center does not maintain a list of "inactive" Bahá'ís. Its membership list is divided into several categories:
- Bahá'ís in good standing, known addresses.
- Bahá'ís in good standing, "mail return."
- Bahá'ís in good standing, "address unknown." This category is a more definitive one than (2). I am not sure what the difference between the two are; the people in Information Services have reliable definitions or each. Perhaps it has to do with the post office's reply.
- Bahá'ís who have lost their rights, are in mental institutions, prisons, etc. These are coded as separate categories. I am uncertain to what extent their addresses are maintained. It would depend on whether they get *The American Bahá'í,* because the main maintenance of the mailing list has to do with the "address correction requested" feature on *The American Bahá'í.*
- Bahá'ís who are dead. When someone dies they remain on the database and their id number is permanently theirs. Obviously, they are not counted as part of the current membership! I say this only because someone has suggested in print that they are included. They aren't, I assure you.
No comments:
Post a Comment